Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus

Epidemiology and Characteristics

  • Most occur from an injury – may be minor
  • Some may be secondary to localized AVN or metabolic problems

Location

  • 70% medial and 30% lateral
  • Usually are posteromedial and anterolateral
  • Lateral are almost always traumatic
  • Lateral tend to be unstable
  • Medial more cystic and more stable
  • 10% have a corresponding kissing lesion on the tibial plafond

Classification

Berndt & Hardy

  1. Stage 1 – Subchondral fracture
  2. Stage 2 – Partially detached fragment
  3. Stage 3 – Detached but stable fragment
  4. Stage 4 – Detached and unstable fragment – free floating
  • This system is based on XR and 50% of OCDs are not seen on XR
  • Newer MRI classifications (e.g., Bristol) use MRI
    • Incorporate bone oedema into their classification

Clinical Features

  • Usually a history of injury, even if minor and some time ago
  • Pain is the main feature
  • Does not settle with non-operative modalities
  • Synovitis can cause secondary impingement

Investigation

  • Visible in 50% on plain X-rays

MRI

  • Gold standard for quantifying lesion, degree of oedema, and other pathology

Management

Non-Operative

  • May help – injection, physio, and activity modification
  • Natural history of OCD is not yet known
  • No current correlation with symptomatic OA
  • RCT in 2000 (Tol et al.)
    • Showed improvement in 50% with non-operative and 80% with debridement
  • Therefore, have a low threshold for arthroscopic debridement

Surgical Treatment

  • Treatment of choice is arthroscopic debridement
  • Chondral flaps and loose bodies
  • Microfracture or curettage to bleeding bone for chondral defects
  • Cartilage grafting (ACI, MACI, Plugs, Mosaicplasty, etc.)
    • Not proven in the ankle
    • Can be considered for larger areas of cartilage loss
Back to top